Uniwersyteckie Czasopisma NaukoweThe ties that bind: exploring the impact of sociometric position, friendships, and bullying on early adolescents’ subjective well-being
Słowa kluczowe:
sociometry, popularity, friendships, subjective well-being, bullyingAbstrakt
Background:
Early adolescence is a crucial period when social connections form an important basis for children’s self-concept and also for their subjective well-being (SWB). Although research has focused on the interactions between SWB of children and their social connections, few studies have examined more than one social aspect simultaneously. In this study, we aimed to ad-dress this research gap by investigating acceptance, rejection, friendships, popularity, and involvement in bullying as predic-tors of children’s SWB, hypothesizing that each makes an independent contribution.
Participants and procedure:
This study examined the interrelations between SWB and key aspects of peer relationships – sociometric position, friend-ships, popularity, and bullying – among 498 Hungarian upper elementary-school children aged 10-14. Using a computerized data-collection method, we assessed peer-nominated social variables and administered measures of SWB (Happiness Meas-ure for Schoolchildren and Mental Health Test).
Results:
The results confirmed the previous findings that SWB is moderately but significantly associated with the number of mutual friendships, rejection, outgoing friendship ties, and victimization experiences.
Conclusions:
The novelty of this research lies in the simultaneous examination of variables typically studied in isolation, allowing for an analysis of their unique contributions as predictors. These findings advance our understanding of the complex interplay be-tween peer relationships and SWB in early adolescence and highlight the importance of fostering positive social connections in school settings to promote children’s well-being.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Alsarrani, A., Hunter, R. F., Dunne, L., & Garcia, L. (2022). Association between friendship quality and subjective wellbeing among adolescents: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 22, 2420. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14776-4
Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 23, 764–771. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23262493
Andrews, N. C. Z., McDowell, H., Spadafora, N., & Dane, A. V. (2022). Using social network position to understand early adolescents’ power and dominance within a school context. School Psychology, 37, 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000445
Bagwell, C. L., & Bukowski, W. M. (2018). Friendship in childhood and adolescence: Features, effects, and processes. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 371–390). Guilford Press.
Bagwell, C. L., & Schmidt, M. E. (2011). Friendships in childhood and adolescence. Guilford Press.
Bouman, T., van der Meulen, M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., Vermande, M. M., & Aleva, E. A. (2012). Peer and self-reports of victimization and bullying: Their differential association with internalizing problems and social adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.08.004
Branson, C. E., & Cornell, D. G. (2009). A comparison of self and peer reports in the assessment of middle school bullying. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 25, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377900802484133
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1944). The graphic presentation of sociometric data. Sociometry, 7, 283–289. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785096
Broidy, L. M., Nagin, D. S., Tremblay, R. E., Bates, J. E., Brame, B., Dodge, K. A., Fergusson, D., Horwood, J. L., Loeber, R., Laird, R., Lynam, D. R., Moffitt, T. E., Pettit, G. S., & Vitaro, F. (2003). Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: a six-site, cross-national study. Developmental Psychology, 39, 222–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.2.222
Bukowski, W. M., & Raufelder, D. (2018). Peers and the self. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 141–156). Guilford Press.
Cillessen, A. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82–99). Guilford Press.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. M. (2018). Sociometric perspectives. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 64–83). Guilford Press.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Marks, P. E. L. (2017). Methodological choices in peer nomination research. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2017, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20206
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557
Criswell, J. H. (1946). Measurement of reciprocation under multiple criteria of choice. Sociometry, 9, 126–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2784978
Davila, M., & Kornienko, O. (2022). Making, keeping, and influencing friends: The role of fear of negative evaluation and gender in adolescent networks. School Psychology, 37, 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000481
Demir, M., & Urberg, K. A. (2004). Friendship and adjustment among adolescents. Journal of Alsarrani, A., Hunter, R. F., Dunne, L., & Garcia, L. (2022). Association between friendship quality and subjective wellbeing among adolescents: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 22, 2420. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14776-4
Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 23, 764–771. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23262493
Andrews, N. C. Z., McDowell, H., Spadafora, N., & Dane, A. V. (2022). Using social network position to understand early adolescents’ power and dominance within a school context. School Psychology, 37, 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000445
Bagwell, C. L., & Bukowski, W. M. (2018). Friendship in childhood and adolescence: Features, effects, and processes. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 371–390). Guilford Press.
Bagwell, C. L., & Schmidt, M. E. (2011). Friendships in childhood and adolescence. Guilford Press.
Bouman, T., van der Meulen, M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., Vermande, M. M., & Aleva, E. A. (2012). Peer and self-reports of victimization and bullying: Their differential association with internalizing problems and social adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.08.004
Branson, C. E., & Cornell, D. G. (2009). A comparison of self and peer reports in the assessment of middle school bullying. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 25, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377900802484133
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1944). The graphic presentation of sociometric data. Sociometry, 7, 283–289. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785096
Broidy, L. M., Nagin, D. S., Tremblay, R. E., Bates, J. E., Brame, B., Dodge, K. A., Fergusson, D., Horwood, J. L., Loeber, R., Laird, R., Lynam, D. R., Moffitt, T. E., Pettit, G. S., & Vitaro, F. (2003). Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: a six-site, cross-national study. Developmental Psychology, 39, 222–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.2.222
Bukowski, W. M., & Raufelder, D. (2018). Peers and the self. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 141–156). Guilford Press.
Cillessen, A. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82–99). Guilford Press.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. M. (2018). Sociometric perspectives. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 64–83). Guilford Press.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Marks, P. E. L. (2017). Methodological choices in peer nomination research. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2017, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20206
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557
Criswell, J. H. (1946). Measurement of reciprocation under multiple criteria of choice. Sociometry, 9, 126–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2784978
Davila, M., & Kornienko, O. (2022). Making, keeping, and influencing friends: The role of fear of negative evaluation and gender in adolescent networks. School Psychology, 37, 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000481
Demir, M., & Urberg, K. A. (2004). Friendship and adjustment among adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.02.006
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207052
Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 11–58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_2
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Ferguson, S. M., & Ryan, A. M. (2019). It’s lonely at the top: Adolescent students’ peer-perceived popularity and self-perceived social contentment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0970-y
Gest, S. D., Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Hartup, W. W. (2001). Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00146
Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00048-7
Giovazolias, T. (2024). The relationship of rejection sensitivity to depressive symptoms in adolescence: The indirect effect of perceived social acceptance by peers. Behavioral Sciences, 14, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010010
Gommans, R., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2015). Nominating under constraints: a systematic comparison of unlimited and limited peer nomination methodologies in elementary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414551761
Goswami, H. (2012). Social relationships and children’s subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 107, 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9864-z
Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.355
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of crosssectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00629
Hodges, E. V. E., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.94
Hoffmann, T., Basa, B., & Kollár, K. N. (2026). When healthy classrooms hurt: How reduced bullying isolates victimized youth through altered friendship and status dynamics. BMC Psychology, 14, 410. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04141-0
Holder, M. D., & Coleman, B. (2009). The contribution of social relationships to children’s happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9083-0
Hoza, B., Bukowski, W. M., & Beery, S. (2000). Assessing peer network and dyadic loneliness. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424jccp2901_12
Huebner, E. S., Gilman, R., & Laughlin, J. E. (2004). A multimethod investigation of the multidimensionality of children’s well-being reports: Discriminant validity across race and gender. Social Indicators Research, 66, 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006821510832
Hui, B. P. H. (2022). Prosocial behavior and well-being: Shifting from the ‘chicken and egg’ to positive feedback loop. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.017
Huitsing, G., Snijders, T. A. B., van Duijn, M. A. J., & Veenstra, R. (2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: a longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000297
Hussong, A. M., Ennett, S. T., McNeish, D. M., Cole, V. T., Gottfredson, N. C., Rothenberg, W. A., & Faris, R. W. (2020). Social network isolation mediates associations between risky symptoms and substance use in the high school transition. Development and Psychopathology, 32, 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457941900049X
Ivens, J. (2007). The development of a happiness measure for schoolchildren. Educational Psychology in Practice, 23, 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360701507301
Katsantonis, I., Barrado, B., McLellan, R., & Gimenez, G. (2024). Subjective well-being and bullying victimisation: a cross-national study of adolescents in 64 countries and economies. Child Indicators Research, 17, 1563–1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-024-10147-0
Katsantonis, I., McLellan, R., & Marquez, J. (2023). The development of subjective well-being and its relationship to self-esteem in early adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 42, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12436
Kaya, A., & Siyez, D. M. (2008). Sociometric status and life satisfaction among Turkish elementary school students. Egitim Arastirmalari – Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 32, 69–82.
Kokai, M., & Cole, E. (2021). A comprehensive model for consultation and intervention in school settings. In E. Cole & M. Kokai (Eds.), Consultation and mental health interventions in school settings: a scientist-practitioner’s guide (pp. 3–18). Hogrefe.
Konu, A. I., Lintonen, T. P., & Rimpelä, M. K. (2002). Factors associated with schoolchildren’s general subjective well-being. Health Education Research, 17, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/17.2.155
Košir, K., & Pečjak, S. (2005). Sociometry as a method for investigating peer relationships: What does it actually measure? Educational Research, 47, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000337604
KSH (2021). Népesség településtípus szerint, jaunár 1 [Population by settlement type, January 1]. Retrieved from https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/nep/hu/nep0037.html
Kulawiak, P. R., & Wilbert, J. (2020). Introduction of a new method for representing sociometric status within the peer group: The example of sociometrically neglected children. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1621830
Ladd, G. W. (2006). Peer rejection, aggressive or withdrawn behavior, and psychological maladjustment from ages 5 to 12: an examination of four predictive models. Child Development, 77, 822–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00905.x
Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1997). Classroom peer acceptance, friendship, and victimization: Distinct relational systems that contribute uniquely to children’s school adjustment? Child Development, 68, 1181–1197. https://doi.org/10.2307/1132300
Ladd, G. W., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2003). The role of chronic peer difficulties in the development of children’s psychological adjustment problems. Child Development, 74, 1344–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00611
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635
Laursen, B., Leggett-James, M. P., & Valdes, O. M. (2023). Relative likeability and relative popularity as sources of influence in children’s friendships. PLoS One, 18, e0283117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283117
Løhre, A., Moksnes, U. K., & Lillefjell, M. (2014). Gender differences in predictors of school wellbeing? Health Education Journal, 73, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896912470822
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
Maresky, L., Ellis, W., Chen, X., & Zarbatany, L. (2021). Implications of social status for well-being in preadolescence and early adolescence. Western Undergraduate Psychology Journal, 9, 1–19.
Mérei, F. (1971). Közösségek rejtett hálózata [Hidden network of communities]. Osiris Kiadó.
Montecillo, M. J., Pejoto, J. L., & Moral, R. V. (2024). Belongingness matters: a qualitative exploration of peer acceptance and rejection among high school students. Eureka: Journal of Educational Research, 3, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.56773/ejer.v3i1.51
Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co.
Muñoz-Silva, A., De la Corte, C., Lorence-Lara, B., & Sanchez-Garcia, M. (2020). Psychosocial adjustment and sociometric status in primary education: Gender differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 607274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607274
Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of children’s peer group status. Developmental Psychology, 19, 856–867. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.19.6.856
Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: a meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.99
Northway, M. L. (1940). A method for depicting social relationships obtained by sociometric testing. Sociometry, 3, 144–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785439
Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Thomson, K. C. (2010). Understanding the link between social and emotional well-being and peer relations in early adolescence: Gender-specific predictors of peer acceptance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1330–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9486-9
Oláh, A., Nagy, H., Magyaródi, T., Török, R., & Vargha, A. (2018). Egy új mentális egészséget mérő kérdőív, a MET kidolgozása [Development of a new mental health questionnaire, the MET]. In E. Lippai (Ed.), Változás az állandóságban: A Magyar Pszichológiai Társaság XXVII. Országos Tudományos Nagygyűlése: Kivonatkötet [Change in Constancy: XXVII National Scientific Meeting of the Hungarian Psychological Society: Volume of abstracts] (pp. 80–81). Magyar Pszichológiai Társaság.
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.611
Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431698018002001
Prinstein, M. J., & Giletta, M. (2020). Future directions in peer relations research. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 49, 556–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2020.1756299
Proctor, C. L., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2009). Youth life satisfaction: a review of the literature. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 583–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9110-9
Rodkin, P. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Child and adolescent peer relations in educational contexts. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 363–389). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-015
Rose, A. J. (2002). Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys. Child Development, 73, 1830–1843. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00509
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.),
Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 571–645). John Wiley & Sons.
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
Salmivalli, C., & Isaacs, J. (2005). Prospective relations among victimization, rejection, friendlessness, and children’s self- and peer-perceptions. Child Development, 76, 1161–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00841.x
Salmivalli, C., & Peets, K. (2018). Bullying and victimization. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 302–321). Guilford Press.
Schwartz-Mette, R. A., Shankman, J., Dueweke, A. R., Borowski, S., & Rose, A. J. (2020). Relations of friendship experiences with depressive symptoms and loneliness in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146, 664–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000239
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.
Țepordei, A. M., Zancu, A. S., Diaconu-Gherasim, L. R., Crumpei-Tanasă, I., Măirean, C., Sălăvăstru, D., & Labăr, A. V. (2023). Children’s peer relationships, well-being, and academic achievement: The mediating role of academic competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1174127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174127
van den Berg, Y. H. M., & Gommans, R. (2017). Computer-based methods for collecting peer nomination data: Utility, practice, and empirical support. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2017, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20207
van Workum, N., Scholte, R. H. J., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lodder, G. M. A., & Giletta, M. (2013). Selection, deselection, and socialization processes of happiness in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 563–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12035
Vargha, A., & Delaney, H. D. (2000). A critique and improvement of the CL common language effect size statistics of McGraw and Wong. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 101–132. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986025002101
Vargha, A., Török, R., Diósi, K., & Oláh, A. (2019). Boldogságmérés az iskolában [Measuring happiness at school]. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 74, 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1556/0016.2019.74.3.4
Veenstra, R., & Huitsing, G. (2021). Social network approaches to bullying and victimization. In P. K. Smith & J. O. Norman (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of bullying: a comprehensive and international review of research and intervention (pp. 196–214). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118482650.ch11
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. J. H., Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual-perspective theory. Child Development, 78, 1843–1854. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01102.x
Wentzel, K. R., Jablansky, S., & Scalise, N. R. (2021). Peer social acceptance and academic achievement: a meta-analytic study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113, 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000468
Weyns, T., Colpin, H., & Verschueren, K. (2021). The role of school-based relationships for school well-being: How different are high- and averageability students? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1127–1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12409
